Cases 1 - 10 of 6,386
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Amber B. Bowman
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Bowman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Amber B. Bowman
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Amber Onken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
