Cases 1 - 10 of 1,840
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
P. et al v. Bluecross Blueshield of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
M P and C. P.
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Benefits Plan, Arthur J Gallagher & Co and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mead v. Officer et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Dean Arthur Mead
Defendant:
B. Deckard Officer, BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Monroe County Sheriff Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $61,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$61,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
ARTHUR KHARATYAN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Ko et al v. University of the Potomac at Chicago LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
Rosanna DePinto, Arthur L Smith Jr., University of the Potomac at Chicago LLC doing business as University of the Potomac and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Soo J Ko and Sana Hamid Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Arthur Miles
as 24-1186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR MILES
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Chess et al
as 3:2024cv50007
Plaintiff:
Edward Abrams
Defendant:
Jamie Chess, Jennifer Hoffman, Ramon Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
