Cases 1 - 10 of 11,087
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hiram Tolliver
Defendant:
D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CITY OF HIGH POINT v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HIGH POINT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
CITY OF GREENSBORO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
TOWN OF SILER CITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF SILER CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
