Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Melvin Warren Rivers v. Fox Broadcasting Company Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07554
Defendant:
Lifetime Entertainment, Fox Entertainment Group Inc., John Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jareer Jaser v. AT&T Services, Incorporated, et al
as 19-10792
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN CHRISTIANSEN, RANDY HICKMAN, JOHN WALSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAREER JASER
VOTTO v. WALSH et al
as 2:2019cv02888
Defendant:
BRIAN FORD, AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P., JOHN WALSH, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
PETER VOTTO
D'Ambrosio v. Ewing, et al
as 19-1352
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WALSH, MICHAEL J. EWING, JOSEPH A. SOLOMON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMERON D'AMBROSIO
Defendant:
METHUEN, MA
Walshe v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03096
Plaintiff:
John Walshe
Defendant:
Doe Corporation and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Madolora et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03961
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SWANSON, SHARON SHANK, MARY HUNTER and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Agri et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11619
Plaintiff:
John Craney, Richard Rodriguez, Stephen Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Allende et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11423
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Bracero, Thomas van de Kieft, Glenda Wajer and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Walsh v. Jeffords
as 4:2018cv00033
Petitioner:
John Walsh
Defendant:
Rob Jeffords
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ryan Walsh et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04933
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh and John Walsh
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Penske Ford and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
