Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luedtke, James v. Keyes, R.D. et al
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
James Luedtke
Defendant:
R.D. Keyes and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Robinson et al
as 4:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Sheriff Wilcher, Sgt Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Savon R.D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk #231238 v. Monroe et al
as 1:2020cv01049
Defendant:
J. Clave, L. Paris, Lori A. Blanchard and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Poche Kirk #231238
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURKEY v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, UNITED STATES, J. T. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY I. PURKEY
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN R. MALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, David Childers, Salvador Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt et al v. GAbbot state of Texa Employees et al
as 1:2017cv08967
Plaintiff:
George G. Wyatt, Lisa M. Hill Wyatt, Nell Johnson and others
Defendant:
GAbbot state of Texa Employees, T-D-C-J-I-Wardens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUSE v. SHEPHERD et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
ABDUWALI ABDUKHADIR MUSE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER McCOY, KIMBERLY RHOADS and R.D. SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Wendy K. Brown, Ms. E. Locust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orozco v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Victor Orozco
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Boswell Pharmacy Services, John Coe and others
Respondent:
R.D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
