Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Young v. Vega
as 24-50190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradley Young
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Vega, FNU Decker, RN Health Safety Administrator, FNU Mitchel, Burse and others
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Trimard C. Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, Deputy FNU Reid, FNU Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iribhogbe v. King et al
as 4:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Edgal Iribhogbe
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, FNU LNU, Captain FNU Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Carroll Jr. v. Sellars et al
as 6:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Larry Don Carroll Jr.
Defendant:
Cpl. FNU Sellars, Mr. FNU Davis and Mr. FNU Wellington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
FNU Harr, J. Spell, FNU Cottel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
