Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charlie L Hardin
Defendant:
FNU Roach, FNU Albright, FNU Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 22-40704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden FNU Gracia, Warden FNU Delapp and others
Moses v. LaSalle Correctional Corp LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Leanthony Moses
Defendant:
LaSalle Correctional Corp LLC, FNU Parks, FNU Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Barbara C Monk
Defendant:
United States, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cheron Y Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOONS, Facilities Director, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Ingram v. Cheetham et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
R. C. Cheetham, FNU Clements, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
