Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Jones #701358 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones #701358
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Kenneth McKee, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Monsoon Irrigation LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Oscar Aguirre
Defendant:
Monsoon Irrigation LLC, Cody Perkins and Unknown Perkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Perkins v. ARD et al
as 5:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Perkins
Defendant:
Domonic ARD, J. Burke, Unknown Perkins and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 21-1328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. K. BERGMAN, Prison Counselor, J. STYES, Food Supervisor, MR. [UNKNOWN] KENYON, Prison Employee and others
Jackson #171107 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Unknown Smutex, Unknown Farley, Unknown Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jackson #171107
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Perkins et al
as 3:2020cv08180
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore and Maddi
Defendant:
Jessica Fleming, Unknown Perkins, Unknown Beeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gauff v. Perkins et al
as 2:2019cv04492
Plaintiff:
Cardell Gauff
Defendant:
Unknown Perkins, Corizon Incorporated and John Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ade Brown v. John Davids, et al
as 19-1557
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] KUTOWIKS, C/O, [UNKNOWN] ZURAD, C/O, [UNKNOWN] MONTGOMERY, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADE BROWN
Richards v. Clark et al
as 3:2019cv08143
Defendant:
Unknown Betty, Unknown Spouse Carlyon, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol v. Reinhart
as 2:2019cv02173
Defendant:
Lorraine J Reinhart, Unknown Howe, Tevis Reich and others
Plaintiff:
Rev Carol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
