Cases 1 - 10 of 4,014
Barton, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02595
Plaintiff:
Daryl Barton, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Brett A. Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton, Adam Murdie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton et al v. B & S Plastics, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Jason Barton and Jennifer Barton
Defendant:
B & S Plastics, Inc. doing business as Waterway Plastics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Nelson v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Adam Murdie, Josh Ashe, Midge Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Adam Murdie, Midge Barton, Aaron Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Adam Murdie, Josh Ash, Midge Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Barton
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Eula Barton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
