Cases 11 - 20 of 557
United States of America v. Braswell
as 24-597
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CYRUS DENNIS BRASWELL
BRASWELL v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Petitioner:
XAVIER BRASWELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braswell v. InCorp Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Susan Braswell
Defendant:
InCorp Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Braswell v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Karen Braswell
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and Softsheen Carson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WARREN v. BRASWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Warren, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyler Braswell, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, New Hanover County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAND, JOHN AGUZZI, ARRINGTON FARMS, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Serna et al v. Turner et al
as 1:2023cv02579
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serna and Ajhalei Snoddy
Defendant:
Anne Turner, FHWA, Eric Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
