Cases 21 - 30 of 3,703
Drew v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08073
Plaintiff:
Corey Drew
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kimera Labs, Inc. v. Exocel Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21426
Plaintiff:
Kimera Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Exocel Bio, Inc., Raj Jayashankar, DEB HUBERS and others
Contreras-Bustillos v. County of Yellowstone, et al.
as 24-2383
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. CONTRERAS-BUSTILLOS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF YELLOWSTONE, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, Officer AIELLO and others
Kimera Labs, Inc. v. Exocel Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mc21426
Plaintiff:
Kimera Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Exocel Bio, Inc., Raj Jayashankar, DEB HUBERS and others
Contreras v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80462
Plaintiff:
Jorge Contreras
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco S.A .de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Herber Otoniel Luna Contreras
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Manuel Contreras
as 24-1767
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel A. Contreras
Contreras v. District Attorney of Edwards County
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
John A. Contreras
Defendant:
District Attorney of Edwards County and Judge of the 452nd District of Edwards County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
