Cases 1 - 10 of 6,612
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luginbyhl v. O'Malley, et al
as 24-6082
Plaintiff:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, Social Security Commissioner and DANIEL I. WERFEL, Internal Revenue Service Commissioner
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bear v. Republic Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Alex Bear
Defendant:
Republic Bancorp, Inc., Republic Bank & Trust Company, CBank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hawkins v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
Deadra Hawkins
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HAWKINS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY B. HAWKINS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hawkins v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03096
Plaintiff:
Telyzuan Ja'Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Lt. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
