Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Partlow v Chambers
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heath D. Partlow
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helvey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Heath Lee Helvey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Davis v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
Brian Heath Davis
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Kris Karberg
Heath Zachary v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 23-3119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATH ZACHARY
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Brian Davis v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 23-2416
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Heath Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs and Kris Karberg
Clyne v. Carlin
as 3:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent:
T Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden
as 1:2023fp00276
Petitioner:
Mark Heath
Respondent:
NH State Prison for Men, Warden
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HEATH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv07270
Petitioner:
DANIEL HEATH
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
