Cases 51 - 60 of 2,582
Eugene Lewis, Jr. v. Hector Ochoa
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
EUGENE J. LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
HECTOR OCHOA, Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Zandro Ochoa
Defendant:
Amina Ahmed, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Alarcon #291020 v. Ochoa et al
as 2:2023cv02587
Plaintiff:
Javier Velazquez Alarcon
Defendant:
W Ochoa, Unknown Castregon, F Aruizu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Mary Ochoa
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ochoa Contreras, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3885
Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL OCHOA CONTRERAS, VICTORIA FLORES PALACIOS and JAMIE JAMES OCHOA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jayshawn R. Allen v. Deputy Roxann Accuna et al
as 2:2023cv10060
Plaintiff:
Dominique Ortiz, Jayshawn R. Allen, D. T. and others
Defendant:
Co of Los Angeles, Javier Ochoa, roxann acuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz-Infante, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3817
Petitioner:
LORENS DEL MILARGO ORTIZ-INFANTE, MATIAS MANUEL LAZO-ORTIZ, VALENTINA DEL MILAGRO LAZO-ORTIZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
