Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 8,704
Santos-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner: JUNNIOR ALEXANDER SANTOS-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLAIRION BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant: CLAIRION BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER OF POLICIES, SGT. OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CABRERA ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner: SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Garcia v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Misbel Rodriguez-Garcia
Defendant: Billie Woods, FNU Santos and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
McNary v. Santos et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01736
Plaintiff: Jason McNary
Defendant: Alex Santos, Jennifer Arriaga and J'Myah Freeman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CASTRO-MOTA v. BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01697
Plaintiff: SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant: BENSALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER GANSKY, POLICE OFFICER BIEICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff: Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant: Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?