Cases 41 - 50 of 58,153
Jonathan Armstrong v. Amy Shipley, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armstrong
Defendant:
Amy Shipley, Laura Barner, Dr. Dehner and others
Armstrong v. Chapman et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Steven Matthew Armstrong
Defendant:
Travis Chapman, Nima Afshar, Haley Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jackie Armstrong
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gee v. Burton et al
as 3:2024cv05219
Plaintiff:
Kassidy Jo Gee
Defendant:
Alicia M Burton, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Constance R White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
ARMSTRONG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03313
Plaintiff:
KALEA JARON ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. McLennan County Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bennie Daryl Scott
Defendant:
McLennan County Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
