Cases 11 - 20 of 26,453
AmTrust International Underwriters Designated Activity Company v. Triton Roofing & Restoration LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
AmTrust International Underwriters Designated Activity Company
Defendant:
Triton Roofing & Restoration LLC and Bryan Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramon Caldwell v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
RAMON CALDWELL
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, MI, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
NANCY HOOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN, MI, POLICE OFFICER LUCAS DOE, POLICE OFFICER BRYAN MUNAFO and others
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
State of California, et al. v. United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, et al.
as 24-2701
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRYAN MUEHLBERGER, FRANK BLACKWELL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of ATF, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
