Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Coffey v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Robert Coffey
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Town of Weaverville, NC, et al
as 1:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Austin McKinney
Defendant:
Town of Weaverville, Selena Coffey and Town of Weaverville, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sharon Coffey Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ALLEN v. CARY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2020cv00144
Respondent:
N. COFFEY, TONI DEZOMITS and CARY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT
Petitioner:
DERRICK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CARY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00969
Defendant:
N. COFFEY, CARY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT and TONI DEZOMITS
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON, et al V. SELECT MANAGMENT RESOURCES, LLC, et al.
as 1:2019cv00823
Plaintiff:
ERIC FIELDS, ALEXIS CANNON, ANTONE WHIDBEE and others
Defendant:
North American Title Loans, LLC, ANDERSON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, LoanSmart, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Onslow Co. Dept. Social Services, Tina Coffey Dean et al
as 7:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Charlotte Hill, Patricia Aycock, Clifford Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Norma Jane Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coffey v. North Carolina Prisoners Legal Services et al
as 3:2018cv00351
Defendant:
Commissioner, North Carolina Prisoners Legal Services, Mary Pollard and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Coffey
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Sharon Coffey Bruce
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
