Cases 1 - 10 of 840
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiroz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Estaban Cantu Quiroz
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warden Flistman and Doctor Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonardo McCray v. Greg Donathan, et al
as 24-1656
Plaintiff:
LEONARDO MCCRAY
Defendant:
GREG DONATHAN, ERIN POSEY, SANDRA HAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
HAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strege v. Smithfield Ham et al
as 3:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Smithfield Ham, Xcel Energy, Craig Schaunaman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carralero, et al. v. Bonta
as 23-4354
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARCO ANTONIO CARRALERO, GARRISON HAM, MICHAEL SCHWARTZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
