Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Henshaw v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02703
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Shody Henshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Guild Mortgage Company, L.L.C.
as 5:2021cv00506
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Company, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Hudson Hayden Henshaw and Andrea Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Henshaw v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2020cv02064
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Henshaw
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Henshaw v. Smith Rouchon & Associates Inc
as 3:2020cv02063
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Henshaw
Defendant:
Smith Rouchon & Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Clark Henshaw
as 20-3367
Defendant / Appellant:
Clark H. Henshaw
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Henshaw v. Midland Credit Management Inc
as 3:2020cv01673
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Henshaw
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robbins et al v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2020cv02094
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eustus Robbins and Ladonna Robbins
Defendant:
Warden Birkholz, D. Lee-Lo, Dr. Tomford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. iHeart Communications Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02359
Plaintiff:
Patrick E. Walker, Lisa Henshaw and Patrick E Walker
Defendant:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF IHEART COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,, JOHN DOES 1-30, IHEART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
