Cases 1 - 10 of 1,465
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Hulett v. AdventHealth Shawnee Mission et al
as 5:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
TC Hulett, Jr
Defendant:
AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, Ashley D. Stillwell, Lauren W. Camara Dela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Joanie E. Martinez
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postmaster Leon Lane, Jr. and Supervisor Baxter 'Bud' Lofland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ransley v. 150 West 21st LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
John Ransley
Defendant:
150 West 21st LLC and Beach Lane Management, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Mark Scharfman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hampton v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
