Cases 1 - 10 of 78,609
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Pharmasource, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Shayla Owens
Defendant:
Pharmasource, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Merriweather v. Owens
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Justin Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Armour v. TX Board of Pardons
as 24-40347
Plaintiff:
Artis Armour
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Gutierriez, Paul Keil and others
Terry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Justin Owen Terry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Shabazz v. Welch et al
as 8:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeem Jahmal Naseer Shabazz and Owen D. Denson
Defendant:
Assitant Warden C. Welch, Assistant Warden A. Williams, Toni Bowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
