Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Elburki v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2024cv03039
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ken McClure, City Clerk Anita Cotter and others
Claimant:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki
Plaintiff:
Kamel M. Elburki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Filiatrault v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02888
Plaintiff:
Evan Filiatrautt and Evan Filiatrault
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, School District 709, Duluth Court System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Filiatrault v. St. Louis County Court et al
as 0:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Evan Gerald Filiatrault
Defendant:
St. Louis County Court, St. Louis Co. Duluth and Minnesota Power Public Works Utilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
