Cases 41 - 50 of 1,903
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Vincent Harry Small
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Midcap et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10699
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Midcap, David Daniel, David Thorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Funk v. Rankins
as 6:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Rankin
as 23-7882
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SULLIVAN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DREW RANKIN
United States of America v. Rankin (Sullivan)
as 23-7887
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES SULLIVAN
United States of America v. Rankin (Bilda)
as 23-7875
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JAMES SULLIVAN, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BILDA
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bushansky v. Gorman et al.
as 1:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Christopher M. Gorman, Alexander M. Cutler, H. James Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Jackson v. Duff et al
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Debra Mays Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Duff, Steven Cunningham, Bruce Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
