Cases 1 - 10 of 36,189
Winsor v. Shockwave Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
Jane Winsor
Defendant:
Shockwave Medical, Inc., Ray Larkin, Doug Godshall and others
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Purvis v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01237
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Ray Purvis
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Masters v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Masters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Warden for MCTC et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Warden for MCTC and Correctional Officer Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. 49th Street Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv03450
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flores Martin
Defendant:
49th Street Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Raymangano 7th Ave. Pizza Corp. d/b/a Famous Original Ray's Pizza, Tony Mangano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leveke v. Hearst Television INC. et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray Leveke
Defendant:
Hearst Television INC., KCCI-TV and Unidentified Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
