General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Sellers v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant: Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sellers v. Sproul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02903
Petitioner: Richard Sellers
Respondent: Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sellers v. Dunbar
as 5:2023cv02237
Petitioner: Fredrick L Sellers
Respondent: R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sellers v. Langford
as 22-3056
Petitioner / Appellant: JERRY D. SELLERS
Respondent / Appellee: DON LANGFORD, Warden
GREENIDGE v. LEHNOWSKY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv06476
Defendant: WELLPATH, LLC, MANFREY, STEPHEN WIENER and others
Plaintiff: GABRIEL GREENIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Petitioner: John Wesley Sellers, III
Respondent: United States of America, State of Indiana, Oscar Martinez, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sellers v. Deville We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01673
Plaintiff: Jaquarious Sellers
Defendant: Keith Deville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sellers (ID 99071) v. Langford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv03259
Respondent: Kansas, State of and Don Langford
Petitioner: Jerry D. Sellers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SELLERS v. INCH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv04936
Petitioner: ROBERT SELLERS
Respondent: MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Sellers et al
as 1:2019cv04839
Respondent: Eric Sellers and T. Bobbit
Petitioner: Jarrett Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?