Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Butler et al v. Rothstein et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bart Butler and Permits Express USA LLC
Defendant:
Michael Rothstein, Custom Construction of Carroll County, LLC and Kelli Shockey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Shockey v. Cox et al
as 5:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ira Shockey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Cox, Correctional Officer Walters, Correctional Officer Holdren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockey v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02232
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Shockey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Aurel v. Zies et al
as 1:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
C. Zies, L. Simpson, R. Roderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron French v. R. Roderick
as 17-6467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON LITTLE FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. RODERICK, Case Management Manager, SEAN SHOCKEY, Case Management Supervisor, JOHN MCMAHON, Case Manager and others
French v. Roderick et al
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Aaron Little French
Defendant:
R. Roderick, S. Shockey, J. McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04849
Plaintiff:
Jill A. Shockey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wimbush v. Bishop
as 1:2014cv00930
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wimbush
Defendant:
Iser, Caple, Wilt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27711
Plaintiff:
Dawn Shockey and Andrew Shockey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
