Cases 1 - 10 of 855
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
WRIGHT v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT
Defendant:
GENO RANSOM, FNU POTRELLA, FNU L. BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Lemont Jerrone Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Webb v. Group Short Term Disability Plan for Teammates of Truist Financial Corporation Employee Benefit Plan
as 6:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Tanya Webb
Defendant:
Group Short Term Disability Plan for Teammates of Truist Financial Corporation Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Webb v. USA
as 3:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Calvarsi Shamar Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Webb v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Nelson Webb
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Colonial Webb Contractors Company v. Hill Phoenix, Inc.
as 24-1237
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL WEBB CONTRACTORS COMPANY
Defendant:
HILL PHOENIX, INC.
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
