Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Mosby v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01206
Plaintiff:
Eddie Mosby
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Gary McCarthy and 911 Operators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rattan v. Rattan et al
as 1:2015cv00229
Defendant:
Commissioner, Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility, Elected Clerk, Head Officers Official and others
Plaintiff:
Arun Rattan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reed v. Fenske et al
as 2:2012cv01430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Brian Fenske, Marc Lewis, Darrell O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANKINS v. CUMMINS et al
as 1:2012cv00683
Defendant:
NURSE ANGIE, NURSE MICHELLE, NURSE NANCY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
MR:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
MRS:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Stone et al
as 3:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hill
Defendant:
Mike Stone , John and/or Jane Doe, Communications District E 911 Lincoln Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higginbotham v. Pleasant Grove, City of et al
as 2:2011cv03904
Plaintiff:
Barry C Higginbotham
Defendant:
Pleasant Grove, City of, Jerry W Brasseale, Willliam Bullion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Righthaven LLC v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2010cv01654
Defendant:
ROD BROOKS and I AM A 911 OPERATOR
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
GORDON v. BECHTEL et al
as 1:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
ROGER GORDON
Defendant:
ROGER BECHTEL, MICHAEL ARCHTIZEL, BRAD WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owen v. City of Imperial 911 Operators et al
as 3:2008cv02028
Plaintiff:
Katherine Avilla Owen
Defendant:
City of Imperial 911 Operators, Dennis Morita, Miguel Colon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
