Cases 1 - 10 of 122
v. Marion II et al
as 1:2024at00583
Defendant:
Carl Bently Marion II and CDCR HQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Marion II v. Oregel et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Defendant:
Edgar Oregel, David Oberst, S. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Bently Marion II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Dept of Child and Fam Svc
as 24-30436
Defendant:
D. Bently and Department of Children & Family Services
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Wells
(PC) Brackett v. Bently
as 2:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
Demond Charles Brackett
Defendant:
Mathew Christopher Bently
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xavier v. Howell et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Franklin Xavier
Defendant:
Dennis A. Howell, Chesley Roebuck, Bently Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spears v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Darrell Spears
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Nick Smith, Henry Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fontaine et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Darren Bently Fontaine and Darren Bently Fontaine II
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wells v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 3:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Wells
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services and D. Bently
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
