Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. HARMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
TYWAN JAMES
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMAN, AMANDA TERRY, KOSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warren County Regional Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Jones
Defendant:
Warren County Regional Jail, Stephen Harman, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen v. Terrell et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Cody John Jensen
Defendant:
ADA Coordinator Terrell, Counselor Jackson, Mr. Pascal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03044
Plaintiff:
Dakota Waters
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. J. Halbsgut, Ms. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Javier Balbuena v. J. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv08789
Plaintiff:
Javier Balbuena
Defendant:
J. Jackson, D. Asuncion, Andrew P. Harman, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanton v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Defendant:
John Doe, John Galipeau, Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Harman
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dai'Shawn M. Neal
Defendant:
Lt. Harman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
