Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Hedgepeth v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Chanda Hedgepeth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Midcap et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06971
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Midcap, David Daniel, David Thorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hedgepeth v. Nash County et al
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
Megan Hedgepeth
Defendant:
Nash County, natalie webb and mary reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowden et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company Inc.
as 8:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROWDEN, STEPHANIE KOONTZ, DUSTIN HEDGEPETH and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a GEICO and Government Employees Insurance Company Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Geico
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hedgepeth v. Smith
as 1:2021cv00707
Plaintiff:
Joel Ethan Hedgepeth
Defendant:
Pam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedgepeth v. Cambell
as 1:2021cv00521
Defendant:
Cambell
Plaintiff:
Joel Ethan Hedgepeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedgepeth v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00497
Defendant:
Mr. Pittman, Jane Doe and Ms. Smith
Plaintiff:
Joel Ethan Hedgepeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM, DOCTOR MARK HAZELRIGG, LT. WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00360
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
