Cases 41 - 50 of 85
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2017cv05888
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Waller , JR
Defendant:
Ranjit S. Mann , Jane Doe Mann and Manney Transport LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mann v. Sirajuddin
as 2:2017cv02434
Plaintiff:
Judith Mann
Defendant:
Iram Agha Sirajuddin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marie v. Horace Mann Insurance Co
as 6:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
Paula Marie
Defendant:
Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2017cv08091
Defendant:
Lakhvir Singh , Mann Carrier Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Hernandez, Jr. and Alejandro Yanez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cotto-Gonzalez v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv00242
Defendant:
Sara Mann , Carlo Mann and Manor Landscaping & Property Maintenance, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pedro Cotto-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitworth v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Nancy Whitworth
Defendant:
Jean Marie Mann and Coast National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Rosario-Lopez et al
as 3:2016cv03134
Plaintiff:
Victoria Page Johnson
Defendant:
Gerardo Rosario-Lopez, Horace Mann Property & Casualty Insurance Company, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker v. Mann et al
as 5:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Robert Whitaker
Defendant:
Pitter A. Mann, Knight Rush Enterprise and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Pitter A. Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan Mann v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv03081
Defendant:
DOES, United States Department of Justice and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jordan Mann
Mann v. Medical Simulation Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00765
Plaintiff:
John B. Mann
Defendant:
Medical Simulation Corporation and H. Benjamin Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
