Cases 1 - 10 of 797
Martinez v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Joanie E. Martinez
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postmaster Leon Lane, Jr. and Supervisor Baxter 'Bud' Lofland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
H & R Block Tax Services LLC v. Money Trust Financial Services, LLC, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff:
H & R Block Tax Services LLC, a Missouri limited liability company
Defendant:
Money Trust Financial Services, LLC and Carlps Jose Martinez
Martinez v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Eva Martinez
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fleming-Martin v. Tripp et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Skyler Fleming-Martin
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Don Martinez, Correctional Officer and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Doe Officers 1-8
as 5:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Tony Santiago Martinez
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Officers 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evelyn Ramos Juarez De Martinez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1675
Petitioner:
Evelyn Y. Ramos Juarez De Martinez and A.O.M.R.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Martinez v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Martinez
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emmanuel De Jesus-Martinez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1579
Petitioner:
Emmanuel De Jesus-Martinez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
