Cases 31 - 40 of 4,695
United States v. Valentin Munoz
as 24-1670
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Valentin Nava Munoz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Vega et al v. Erica Munoz et al
as 1:2024cv02303
Plaintiff:
Sergio Vega and Annette Rodriguez
Defendant:
Erica Munoz, Pinche Vegana, LLC, Pinche Vegana Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 tr Trademark Infringement
Munoz, et al v. Conduent State & Local Solutions, et al
as 24-2044
Plaintiff:
ANA MUNOZ and MICHAEL TILLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
CONDUENT STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC., CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC. and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mora v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mora
Defendant:
Mary Fuentes, Adrian Munoz, Jerry Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUNOZ DITA v. DAYNAY SERVICES LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
ROGELIO MUNOZ DITA
Defendant:
DAYNAY SERVICES LLC. and NAYMI RODRIGUEZ AVILA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Munoz Zuleta v. Krom et al
as 1:2024cv02363
Plaintiff:
Hector Munoz Zuleta
Defendant:
J. Krom, P. Page-Cannonier and Dr. M. Gusman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
