Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 799
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff: Alfonso Carmona
Defendant: Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulet v. Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01022
Plaintiff: Wirney Mulet
Defendant: Modern Pool Cage Painting, LLC and Evis Pina Garcia
Richards v. Exxon Mobile et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Christopher Richards
Defendant: Exxon Mobil, A Corporation, Danny Long and Aaron Pina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type: Labor Labor: Other
United States of America v. Salaman
as 24-1124
Defendant: LUIS SALAMAN, ISMAEL HEREDIA, CHRISTIAN LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pina-Albino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2606
Petitioner: SANDRA PINA-ALBINO and GIANELLA LUCIA VILLEGAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fullilove v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02875
Plaintiff: Henry Fullilove
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Dublin Bar and Grill, Inc. doing business as Dublin's Bar & Grill, Richard Pina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tabor v. Powder River Transportation Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: David Tabor
Defendant: Powder River Transportation Services Inc, ECI LLC and Pina Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pina v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 3:2024cv01976
Plaintiff: Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant: Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pina v. Garland
as 24-1942
Petitioner: JUAN ARREOLA PINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Claire et al v. EKRE of TX, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00302
Plaintiff: Nicholas Claire and Julie Pina
Defendant: EKRE of TX, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc. and TVC Funding III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?