Cases 1 - 10 of 20,812
Kelly v. ORANGE et al
as 8:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Ace Kuumealoha Kelly
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Arevalo et al v. Eddy O. Marban, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv21689
Plaintiff:
Noris Arevalo, Juan Arevalo Villalobos, Tomas Avendano and others
Defendant:
Eddy O. Marban, P.A., Dammous Law PLLC., Edilberto O. Marban and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Babeneau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOOKRA v. BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SOOKRA and APRIL BURCH-SOOKRA
Defendant:
BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL, PFIZER, INC., XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Ace Kelley v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Ace Kelley
Defendant:
County of Orange, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3365
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3366
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
