Cases 1 - 10 of 3,748
United States v. Mykus Butler
as 24-2018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mykus Butler, also known as Dukes, also known as Dukes Da Don, also known as The Top Shooter
Rodrigues Da Silva v. Silveira Da Silva et al
as 1:2024cv11280
Plaintiff:
Edervaldo Rodrigues Da Silva
Defendant:
Jessica Silveira Da Silva and Gilberto Lucas
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Da Silva v. Fox Rent a Car, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
LIVIA DA SILVA
Defendant:
FOX RENT A CAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Trout, et al. v. County of Madera, et al.
as 24-2956
Plaintiff:
KEITH TROUT, guardian ad litem of minor DA; minor JG1; minor JG2; and minor JG3 and ESTATE OF CALLEY JEAN GARAY, by and through her successor in interest, Keith Trout
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MADERA, COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MADERA COUNTY, INC., CAMARENA HEALTH and others
USA v. Goins
as 24-20187
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnathan E. Goins, also known as KB da Mac
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Das v. IRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11158
Plaintiff:
DYLAN DAS
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and JULIE ZEILER
Gomes Calixto v. Garland
as 24-1151
Petitioner:
NACIPE GOMES CALIXTO, JULIANA DA SILVA GUEDES and MARIA ALICE GUEDES CALIXTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
