Cases 1 - 10 of 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BroncBuster LLC v. BroncoMondo et al
as 5:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
BroncBuster LLC
Defendant:
BroncoMondo, Changzhou Desai Vehicle Parts Co., Ltd. and Xomzema
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Paul Navarrete Quintana et al v. Cynthia E. Lermond et al
as 2:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Paul Navarrete Quintana
Defendant:
Cynthia E. Lermond, Melisa Jones, Nicole L. Paglione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Crayton v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Bob, Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
