Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Islas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Javier Guillen Islas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
(PC) Jefferson v. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almanza-Guillen v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Rafael Almanza-Guillen
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guillen v. Schleicher et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Matthew Guillen
Defendant:
Tyler Schleicher, Edgar Galdamez and Jaime Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Guillen v. Schleicher, et al.
as 1:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Matthew Guillen
Defendant:
Tyler Schleicher, Edgar Galdamez and Jamie Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillen Orta v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Daniela Guillen Orta
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guillen v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01730
Plaintiff:
Janette Guillen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hounihan v. Well Path Health Care Provider, et al.
as 1:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Hounihan
Defendant:
Well Path Health Care Provider, Erica Givillen, Crystal Benedix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Seminole County, Dennis Lemma, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
