Cases 1 - 10 of 634
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN ANGELA REAVES and GEORGIA, STATE OF
Petitioner:
MALCOLM J JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SAMPSON
as 4:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
MACOLM J JACKSON
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billy J. Jackson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01616
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Defendant:
White, W/M, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, B. King, Sgt., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, Kentara Coleman, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC and others
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Jackson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00929
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
United States of America v. Jackson
as 24-3592
Defendant:
TONY J. JACKSON, Mizzle, Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. American Honda Finance Corporation
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Jackson
Defendant:
American Honda Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 501 Violation of Federal Reserve Act
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
