Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7346
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00874
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saunders-El v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00878
Petitioner:
Antonio J Saunders-El
Respondent:
Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pozo v. Annucci et al
as 9:2013cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pozo
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fischer, Waninges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. CDCR et al
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Saunders
Defendant:
CDCR, CenterPoit Inc. and Substance Abuse Service Coordinating Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Saunders et al
as 12-3459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Saunders, Corrections Officer, J. Serrell, Corrections Officer, M. Brockley, Corrections Officer and others
Martin et al v. Augusta Richmond County Georgia, Commissioner et al
as 1:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Martin , Charles N. Cody, Sr. , Bobby D. Harper and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, Commission , Deke S. Copenhaver , County Board of Education of Richmond County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Denny, et al
as 2:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
David G. Leonard
Defendant:
Jim Denny, J. Saunder, Dorris Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael J Saunders
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Somerville v. Saunders et al
as 9:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
Dionsio Somerville
Defendant:
J. Saunders, Bezio, A. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
