Cases 1 - 10 of 10,017
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chakotay Johnson v. Mark Zuckerberg
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Meta; Facebook.com
Justin Johnson v. Jacob Schurman, et al
as 24-2002
Plaintiff:
Justin Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Schurman, in his individual capacity only and Christopher Taylor, in his individual capacity only
Johnson v. Milstead et al
as 4:2024cv04094
Petitioner:
Darrian Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Milstead and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Johnson et al v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson, Nicole Price, Narene Crosby and others
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Andrew Bailey, Jay Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Jefferson County v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al
as 24-1550
Plaintiff:
Jefferson County
Defendant:
M.D. Dannie E. Williams, Delmar Primary Care Associates, LLC, Gurpreet S. Padda and others
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
