Cases 51 - 60 of 4,701
United States v. Emiliano Munoz
as 24-1573
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Emiliano Nava Munoz
Emmett Brock et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
EMMETT BROCK
Petitioner:
SGT RAYMOND MUNOZ, SGT JEREMIAH FLETCHER and CMDR ALLEN CASTELLANO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JOSEPH BENZA III, CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Munoz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv20992
Plaintiff:
Roxana Yissel Munoz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Munoz v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Munoz and Rogelio Argote Munoz
Defendant:
Billy Woods, FNU Eiroen and Dennis Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepepa et al v. The Ribbon Worldwide 44 LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
Jose Faria, Laidi Elkouas, Gabriel Tepepa and others
Defendant:
THE RIBBON WORLDWIDE 44 LLC d/b/a BACALLS RESTAURANT, Kenneth Sturm and The Ribbon Worldwide 44 LLC doing business as Bacall's Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Batres Munoz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1344
Petitioner:
SONIA DEL CARMEN BATRES MUNOZ, JAIR HUMBERTO SANTOS BATRES and NATALY JOSEFA SANTOS BATRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rocio Munoz v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Rocio Munoz
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Jusuf Kassis, Officer Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
