Cases 1 - 10 of 960
Eugene Perkins v. Derrick Frye
as 24-1907
Plaintiff:
Eugene Perkins
Defendant:
Derrick Frye, Police Officer, Individual and Official Capacity
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv21548
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Stuart Perkins and Miami-Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Biden et al
as 0:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Director of the Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Perkins v. Westsall
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Nichole Westsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
