Cases 41 - 50 of 611
Gonzalez-Perez v. USA
as 0:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perez v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv03125
Plaintiff:
Charles Benjamin Perez
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
United States v. Santos Perez
as 22-3577
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Santos Gomez Perez
Soto v. Strayhorn et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Francisco Soto
Defendant:
Cole Strayhorn, Letron Tate, Juan Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. Labmed Services, LLC, et al
as 22-3457
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Labmed Services, LLC, SeroDynamics, LLC, Beau Gertz and others
United States v. Santiago Valdivia-Perez
as 22-3445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Santiago Valdivia-Perez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
John Ross v. Greg Rechcigl, et al
as 22-3065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Ross
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Rechcigl, Health Services Administrator, EARU, Tammy Kimble, Assistant Health Services Administrator, EARU, Gary Kerstein, Doctor, EARU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
