Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Dean Manes v. City of Santa Ana, et al
as 23-55543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA ANA, in official capacity, Official capacity Erroneously Sued As Santa Ana Jail, NAPHCARE, INC., Erroneously Sued As Naphcare, PEREZ, Supervisor Officer;individual capacity and others
Reynosa v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01556
Petitioner:
Jose H Reynosa
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
YUEN et al v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INC et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
CAM YUEN, ARRIANNA GARCIA, KATHRYN HEBERLING and others
Defendant:
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC and IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Reynosa-Romero v. Garland
as 22-60617
Petitioner:
David Reynosa-Romero
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Bacon et al
as 3:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Heather Bacon, Danyell No, Phoebe Lowe and others
Defendant:
The City of Chula Vista, The Chula Vista Police Department and The Alpha Project
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Yuen et al v. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04297
Plaintiff:
Cam Yuen, Arrianna Garcia, Kathryn Heberling and others
Defendant:
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and IDEXX Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Daryl Harmon v. E. Reynosa et al
as 5:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Daryl Harmon
Defendant:
E. Reynosa, J. Vaca, J Curiel Magana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Hugo Reynosa
as 22-1321
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HUGO REYNOSA
Cobos v. Chavez et al
as 7:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Luis Roberto Cobos
Defendant:
Candelario Chavez and Fletes Y Acarreos De Reynosa, SA DE CV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
