Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 448
Majid v. Nurse Practioner Everln May et al
as 0:2024cv01944
Plaintiff: Shahid Majid
Defendant: Nurse Practioner Everln May, Nurse Practioner Lilian Emetu, Medical Director Wanda Sermons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
USA v. Shahid Tahir
as 24-1279
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SHAHID TAHIR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02433
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02433
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Majid v. Staggers et al
as 0:2024cv01452
Plaintiff: Shahid Majid
Defendant: Clerk Sharon Staggers, SLED Director Mark Keel and SCDC Paul T. Ahearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Shahid v. South African Airways et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Kesha M. Shahid
Defendant: South African Airways, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Shahid v. South African Airways et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Kesha M. Shahid
Defendant: South African Airways, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin Tolliver v. Jeff Noble, et al
as 23-4035
Plaintiff: KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant: WARDEN JEFF NOBLE, STANLEY TAYLOR, INVESTIGATOR MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
AKRAM v. AKRAM et al
as 2:2023cv23147
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD IMRAN AKRAM
Defendant: MUHAMMAD SHAHID AKRAM, MUHAMMAD SHAHID HAYAT, SHOIB SAJJAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?