Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,569
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff: BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Jerry Sharpe v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6164
Petitioner: JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent: EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Jerry Sharpe v. North Carolina State
as 24-6162
Petitioner: JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent: NORTH CAROLINA STATE
Spade v. Sharp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner: Daniel William Spade
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolley v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff: Eric Jason Tolley
Defendant: Morrow, Monroe Dodson, DeHoog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Sharp
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner: Brandon J Berry
Respondent: Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Anderson, The City of et al
as 8:2024cv00736
Plaintiff: Brent Sharp
Defendant: Anderson, The City of, Anderson Police Department, Shelby Millington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brown v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00589
Petitioner: Demetrius Alexander Brown
Respondent: South Carolina Department of Corrections, Turbeville Correctional Institution, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHARPE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner: FURLANDO PIERRE SHARPE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sharp v. Wrigglesworth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner: Delmar Sharray Sharp
Respondent: Scott Wrigglesworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?