Cases 1 - 10 of 2,594
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Capital Humane Society et al
as 4:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
Capital Humane Society, Officer Steen #93, Officer Finelli #84 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. City Impound Lot et al
as 4:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
City Impound Lot, Mr. Jim Schwartztrauber, Ms. Sara Schwartztrauber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tarun Vyas v. Bryan Hutcheson
as 24-6303
Petitioner:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Respondent:
SHERIFF BRYAN HUTCHESON, HAROLD W. CLARKE and JASON S. MIYARES
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Clark v. Hartmann et al
as 4:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
Klaus Hartmann, Brittani E. Lewit, Kristi Egger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Reuter et al
as 4:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
Rodney Reuter, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6272
Petitioner:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
